Sample Fictional case · names and addresses blurred
October 30, 2026
Tasha [redacted]
[redacted]
Brunswick, ME 04011
[redacted] Residential LLC
[redacted]
Atlanta, GA 30339
Re: Demand for return of security deposit — [redacted], Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Dear [redacted] Residential LLC:
I am writing to dispute the $1,200.00 in deductions shown in the itemized statement I received on July 27, 2026, and to demand return of that amount.
I rented the property identified above under a lease from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. I paid a $1,500.00 security deposit and moved out and returned possession on June 30, 2026. I received a $300.00 refund and your itemized statement on July 27, 2026.1 My dispute concerns the lawfulness of the two deductions totaling the remaining $1,200.00.
I dispute the entire $700.00 countertop-resurfacing charge. The existing-damage list signed before I moved in records “kitchen counter scratched near sink.”2 Under O.C.G.A. § 44-7-33(a), a pre-move-in damage list signed by both parties is conclusive evidence of the condition it records3, except for hidden defects. I have the signed list and move-out photographs. I should not be charged for resurfacing to address a scratch recorded before my tenancy. Please identify the damage attributed to me and provide the photographs and resurfacing records supporting this charge.
I also dispute the entire $500.00 deep-cleaning charge. I cleaned the apartment thoroughly before leaving and have move-out photographs. A cleaning bill alone would not establish that I owed this charge. Please identify what cleaning was necessary, the lease obligation supporting the charge, and the records supporting the amount.
Under O.C.G.A. § 44-7-35(c), I may recover three times the amount improperly withheld, plus reasonable attorney’s fees. If I establish that the full $1,200.00 was improperly withheld, my potential total recovery is $1,200.00 × 3 = $3,600.00, plus reasonable attorney’s fees4. This is potential recovery in court, not my immediate settlement request. My eligibility for that enhanced award depends on a finding of wrongful withholding and the absence of proof that the withholding was unintentional and resulted from a good-faith error5 despite procedures reasonably designed to avoid such errors.
To settle this matter now, I request payment of $1,200.00 by November 13, 20266. This settlement request is lower than my potential $3,600.00 recovery in court, plus reasonable attorney’s fees. Please mail payment by check or money order to my address above.
I would prefer to resolve this matter without litigation. If I do not receive payment by November 13, 2026, I will file a complaint in small claims court without further notice.
Sincerely,
____________________________
Tasha [redacted]