Sample Fictional case · names and addresses blurred
October 27, 2026
Natalie [redacted]
[redacted]
Sacramento, CA 95814
[redacted] Property Holdings LLC
[redacted]
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Demand for return of security deposit — [redacted], Sacramento, California 95814
Dear [redacted] Property Holdings LLC:
I demand return of the remaining $1,400.00 of my security deposit.
I rented [redacted], Sacramento, California 95814, from September 1, 2025 through August 31, 2026, and paid a $2,000.00 security deposit. I moved out and returned possession on August 31, 2026. I received a $600.00 refund and an itemized statement on September 30, 2026.
Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(h)(1)1, you had 21 days after August 31, 2026—until September 21, 2026—to return my security deposit or send the itemized list of deductions. You missed that deadline: the refund and itemized statement were not provided until September 30, 2026, nine days late2. This violation is separate from my objections to the deductions themselves.
I dispute the entire $1,000.00 carpet replacement charge. The carpet was old and worn when I moved in, with several worn-down patches, and looked the same when I moved out. The replacement charge concerns ordinary wear and a pre-existing condition, not damage I caused.
I also dispute the entire $400.00 painting charge. The walls already had many nail holes when I moved in, and I added no new holes. I should not be charged to fill and paint holes that existed before my tenancy.
I cleaned the home thoroughly and removed all my belongings before returning possession. I have photographs from both move-in and move-out supporting my account of the property’s condition.
Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(b), (e)(1), repair deductions must be allowed and reasonably necessary for damage caused by me or my guests, excluding ordinary wear and tear. I dispute both charges because they concern unchanged or pre-existing conditions. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(m), you bear the burden of proving1 that the amounts claimed were reasonable. I request the supporting bills, invoices or receipts, any required labor descriptions, time spent and hourly rates, and the required condition photographs under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(g)-(h).
I am entitled to return of the $1,400.00 wrongfully withheld. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(m), if a judge finds that you retained my deposit in bad faith, I may also recover statutory damages of up to twice my full $2,000.00 deposit. Those statutory damages are not automatic1 and depend on the judge’s finding of bad faith. My potential recovery under this provision is $1,400.00 in actual damages plus up to $4,000.00 in statutory damages, for a total of up to $5,400.00.
To settle this matter now, I request payment of $1,400.00 by November 10, 20261. This settlement demand is lower than the potential $5,400.00 recovery described above. I request that payment be made by check or money order mailed to my address above.
I would prefer to resolve this matter without litigation.
If I do not receive payment by November 10, 2026, I will file a complaint in small claims court without further notice.
Sincerely,
____________________________
Natalie [redacted]